IFRS 9’s Dual Impact on East African Banks: Balancing Risk-Aversion with Growth

IFRS 9's Dual Impact on East African Banks: Balancing Risk-Aversion with Growth

The implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9) has introduced a paradigm shift in the way financial assets are classified, measured, and, most crucially, impaired. For banks across East Africa, this standard is a double-edged sword, simultaneously strengthening financial resilience through risk-aversion while posing a complex challenge to maintaining traditional growth models.

IFRS 9 replaced the outdated ‘incurred loss’ model of IAS 39 with a proactive ‘expected credit loss’ (ECL) model. This change demands that banks recognize potential losses much earlier—even at the point a loan is originated—and requires the use of forward-looking economic information in their provisioning calculations. This shift has created a dual impact that is reshaping the East African banking landscape.


1. The Risk-Aversion Imperative: Strengthening the Foundation

The primary goal of IFRS 9 is to build a more robust and shock-resistant financial system. For East African banks, the ECL model mandates a level of prudence that directly addresses regional vulnerabilities.

Early Recognition of Credit Losses

Under IAS 39, loan loss provisions were only made once an ‘objective event’ of impairment occurred (e.g., a missed payment). IFRS 9 forces banks to look forward, requiring them to provision for lifetime expected losses if an asset’s credit risk has significantly increased since origination.

  • Benefit: This proactive approach strengthens balance sheets, prevents the accumulation of ‘too little, too late’ provisions, and enhances depositor and investor confidence in the bank’s true financial health.
  • Impact on East Africa: Given the economic volatility and higher incidence of non-performing loans (NPLs) often seen in emerging markets, this early provisioning is a vital safeguard against systemic risk. Studies on Kenyan and Tanzanian banks, for instance, confirm the standard’s significant influence on risk management practices.

Enhanced Risk Management and Transparency

The complex data and modeling requirements of ECL necessitate a complete overhaul of risk management infrastructure.

  • Requirement: Banks must now integrate economic forecasts (e.g., for inflation, GDP growth, currency fluctuations) into their credit risk models. This requires massive investments in data systems, analytical tools, and specialized talent (data scientists and model validators).
  • Benefit: The resulting alignment between the Risk (who models the probability of default) and Finance/Accounting (who reports the provisions) departments leads to a more holistic understanding of risk, allowing management to make better-informed strategic decisions.

2. The Growth Challenge: Navigating the Trade-Off

While risk-aversion secures the bank, it also creates friction with the fundamental objective of driving economic growth through lending. The increased cost and capital demands of IFRS 9 can unintentionally lead to a more conservative lending environment.

The ‘Cliff Effect’ and Reduced Lending

The requirement to book an immediate expected loss (ECL) upon loan origination, especially for high-risk segments, makes certain lending activities financially less attractive.

  • Impact on SMEs: Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are the backbone of many East African economies but often represent higher credit risk due to limited financial history and collateral. The new provisioning requirements mean the cost of extending credit to this vital sector increases, potentially leading banks to tighten lending standards or increase loan pricing, which can slow overall economic growth.
  • Capital Impact: The upfront provisioning can lead to an initial hit to a bank’s retained earnings and, consequently, its capital adequacy ratios (CAR). While this effect can be mitigated over time, the immediate need to maintain capital buffers can pressure banks to reduce risk-weighted assets, often resulting in less aggressive loan book expansion.

Operational and Cost Burdens

Implementing IFRS 9 is neither cheap nor easy, especially for smaller East African banks.

  • Data and IT: Many smaller institutions in the region lack the historical data depth (often needing 5-10 years of data) and sophisticated IT systems required to accurately calculate PD (Probability of Default) and LGD (Loss Given Default) under various forward-looking economic scenarios. This forces reliance on external consultants or simpler, more conservative models, which can lead to over-provisioning.
  • Expertise: There is a significant scarcity of specialized quantitative and accounting expertise needed for model development, validation, and maintenance, leading to high operational costs and dependency on external resources.

3. Achieving Equilibrium: Strategies for East African Banks

To successfully navigate the dual impact of IFRS 9, East African banks must adopt strategies that turn regulatory compliance into a competitive advantage.

StrategyActionGrowth/Risk Focus
Data and Modelling InvestmentPrioritize investment in high-quality data governance and sophisticated analytical models that can accurately forecast credit risk in local economic contexts.Risk-Aversion (Accuracy)
Proactive Portfolio ManagementUse the new ECL metrics (PD, LGD) not just for provisioning, but as early warning indicators to adjust credit underwriting, re-price products, and engage in proactive restructuring of loans.Balance (Risk & Growth)
Targeted SME LendingInstead of blanket restricting SME credit, utilize technology (e.g., mobile money data, digital footprint) for better credit scoring and risk diversification, making higher-risk lending feasible.Growth (Strategic Lending)
Diversification of IncomeIncrease reliance on non-funded income sources, such as transactional fees, trade finance, and digital services, to offset potential volatility and reductions in interest income due to higher provisioning.Growth (Resilience)
Regulatory DialogueMaintain close communication with local central banks and regulators to align IFRS 9 interpretations with national economic development goals and secure guidance on data-poor portfolios.Risk-Aversion (Compliance)

Export to Sheets

In conclusion, IFRS 9 is a necessary evolution, pushing East African banks toward global best practices in risk management. However, its success hinges on the ability of bank management to move beyond compliance and leverage the new transparency to make smarter, more strategic decisions. The future of East African banking lies in mastering the delicate balance: using rigorous risk-aversion as the foundation for sustainable, technology-driven growth.

IFRS 9’s Dual Impact on East African Banks: Balancing Risk-Aversion with Growth

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top