IFRS 9 vs IAS 39 (Oman Perspective)

The transition from IAS 39 to IFRS 9 represents one of the most significant shifts in financial history. For Oman’s banking and corporate sectors, this isn’t just a change in accounting “rules”—it’s a fundamental overhaul of how risk is perceived, measured, and reported. Under the guidance of the Central Bank of Oman (CBO), this transition aligns the Sultanate with global best practices and the economic goals of Oman Vision 2040.

1. The Core Philosophy: Reactive vs. Proactive

The most dramatic difference lies in how losses are recognized.

IAS 39 (Incurred Loss Model):

Known as the “too little, too late” approach. Under IAS 39, banks in Oman could only recognize a loss after a specific “trigger event” occurred (e.g., a borrower actually missed a payment).

IFRS 9 (Expected Credit Loss – ECL):

This is a forward-looking model. From the moment a loan is granted, a bank must estimate potential future losses based on historical data, current conditions, and—crucially—future economic forecasts.

2. Classification and Measurement

IFRS 9 simplifies the complex and often confusing categories of IAS 39 into three clear paths based on the Business Model Test and the SPPI (Solely Payments of Principal and Interest) Test.

Feature	IAS 39	IFRS 9
Categories	Four (HTM, L&R, AFS, FVTPL)	Three (Amortized Cost, FVOCI, FVTPL)
Reclassification	Permitted frequently	Very rare (only if business model changes)
Equity Instruments	Measured at cost if unquoted	Must be Fair Value (Cost is rarely used)

3. The Impact on Oman’s Banking Sector

The Central Bank of Oman (Circular BM 1149) has been instrumental in ensuring a stable transition. For Omani banks, the shift to IFRS 9 has meant:

Increased Provisioning:

In the initial years, many banks saw a spike in provisions as they accounted for “Stage 1” (12-month) and “Stage 2” (lifetime) expected losses.

Capital Adequacy:

Because provisions hit the bottom line, Omani banks had to carefully manage their Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital ratios to ensure they remained compliant with Basel III standards.

Data Integration:

Banks have invested heavily in sophisticated data analytics to track macroeconomic indicators like oil prices and GDP growth, which now directly influence their financial statements.

Expert Insight: In Oman, the sensitivity of the economy to oil price fluctuations makes the “forward-looking” element of IFRS 9 particularly volatile. Accountants must now act like economists, predicting how global energy shifts will impact local credit risk.

4. Why it Matters for Corporates

While banks feel the most pressure, Omani corporates with significant trade receivables are also affected. The “Simplified Approach” under IFRS 9 requires companies to use a provision matrix to estimate losses on their invoices immediately, rather than waiting for a customer to default.

Conclusion

The move to IFRS 9 has brought greater transparency to Oman’s financial markets. By forcing institutions to acknowledge risks earlier, the Sultanate has built a more resilient financial system capable of weathering global economic storms.

Fineit provides end-to-end IFRS 9 advisory services in Oman, helping institutions move beyond compliance into smarter risk management and stronger financial resilience.
👉 Partner with Fineit for IFRS 9 success in Oman.