Comparison: IFRS 9 vs IAS 39

Comparison IFRS 9 vs IAS 39

IFRS 9 and IAS 39 are both accounting rules. These rules help companies keep track of money they lend, borrow, or invest. But there are big differences between them.

Old vs. New

  • IAS 39 is the old rule.
  • IFRS 9 is the new rule that replaces IAS 39.

IFRS 9 was made to fix the problems in IAS 39.

1. How Money Items Are Grouped (Classification)

IAS 39

  • Had too many groups.
  • It was hard to decide where to put things.

IFRS 9

  • Has only 3 groups.
  • It is easier to use.

2. When to Show Losses (Impairment)

IAS 39

  • Showed a loss only when it already happened.
  • This was called the incurred loss model.
  • Bad news came too late.

IFRS 9

  • Shows losses early, even before they happen.
  • This is called the expected credit loss model (ECL).
  • It helps companies be better prepared.

3. Hedge Accounting (Protecting Against Risk)

IAS 39

  • Had very strict rules.
  • Many companies could not use hedge accounting.

IFRS 9

  • Has simpler, more flexible rules.
  • More companies can show how they manage risks.

Why the Change?

In 2008, the world had a big financial crisis. People said IAS 39 hid losses too long. IFRS 9 was made to show risks earlier, help banks, and protect investors.

Summary Table

AreaIAS 39IFRS 9
ClassificationMany types, complex3 types, simple
ImpairmentLoss shown after it happensLoss shown early (ECL)
Hedge AccountingHard to useEasier to use

Final Words

IFRS 9 is better than IAS 39 because it:
✔️ Is simpler
✔️ Shows risks earlier
✔️ Helps companies tell the truth about their money

This is why IFRS 9 Software Solution replaced IAS 39 in most countries.

Comparison: IFRS 9 vs IAS 39

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top